Methodology

Vertical vs Horizontal Rule

Framework distinguishing between vertical monarchical/aristocratic control and horizontal republican/democratic systems, both controlled by the same elite according to Octogon theory

AI-Generated Content

This content was written by AI and has not been 100% reviewed by the owner of this site. Read our disclaimer for more information.

methodology

External Links

Room 101 Part 1

Summary

The Vertical vs Horizontal Rule framework is a political theory developed by researcher Dr. Sean Hross to describe two competing systems of elite control. According to this theory, both the traditional monarchical/aristocratic system (vertical) and the modern republican/democratic system (horizontal) are controlled by the same "Pharaoh Nobility," presenting a false dichotomy to the general population.

The Vertical System

Characteristics

Structure:

Monarchies, empires, dictatorships
Clear hierarchy: King → Lords → People
Feudal primogeniture (firstborn inherits)
Open aristocratic rule

Examples:

Medieval European kingdoms
Absolute monarchies
Modern Gulf states
Absolute dictatorships

Symbolism:

Obelisks (phallic symbols of power)
Crowns and thrones
Vertical architecture (cathedrals, towers)
Top-down control imagery

The OWO (Old World Order)

Pre-French Revolution European system
Kings ruled by divine right
Feudal obligations
Nobility openly in power

The Horizontal System

Characteristics

Structure:

Republics, democracies, "people's" states
Appearance of equality: Everyone has "vote"
Republican rotation (elections)
Hidden aristocratic rule

Examples:

Post-1789 French Republic
United States
European Union
Most modern "democracies"

Symbolism:

Horizontal lines (Templar cross)
Circular/oval shapes (womb symbolism)
Masonic square and compass
Network/grid imagery

The NWO (New World Order)

Post-French Revolution system
"Democratic" appearances
Elite control through finance
Same families, different titles

The Templar Connection

Historical Transition

According to Hross:

The Problem:

Templars were 2nd, 3rd, 4th sons of nobility
No right to inherit under primogeniture
Excluded from vertical power structure

The Solution:

Created horizontal political system
Republic: Anyone can be "king" for 4-7 years
Eliminated primogeniture barrier
Established alternative power base

The Swiss Base

Templars fled to Switzerland (1291)
Created "neutral" horizontal base
From there, spread horizontal system globally
French Revolution (1789) was transition point

The False Dichotomy

Elite Control in Both Systems

According to Hross:

Aspect	Vertical (OWO)	Horizontal (NWO)
Rulers	Kings openly	Presidents covertly
Selection	Birth	Pre-selection + "election"
Control	Direct	Through finance
Appearance	Aristocracy	Democracy
Reality	Elite rule	Same elite rule

The True Battle

Horizontal Wars (Distraction):

Nation vs nation
Left vs right
Race vs race
Religion vs religion
Elite profits from all sides

Vertical War (Solution):

Population vs elite
Bypasses horizontal divisions
Targets actual controllers
Only path to real change

Quote from Dr. Sean Hross

"There is vertical christianity by the feudal Kings, and there is horizontal christianity by the republican Templars, which is the main reason, that protestants and catholics don't like eachother" ~ Dr. Sean Hross

"The French Kings of the feudal primogenitura Old World Order resided in the West alongside the river Loire, while the 2nd and 3rd sons organized the NWO in the swamps, mountains and extended forests in the North East of France before crossing over to Switzerland - their Templars refuge."

"Liberty, Equality, Fraternity not for us the People but for our Masters non Primagenitura. FRATERNITY in the brotherhood of Pharaoh, so they will have no more internal strife. EQUALITY so all sons of aristocratic Pharaoh have equal rights. LIBERTY so they can all be free to be the King for a presidential period of 4, 5 or 7 years depending on the country."